The Supreme Court of India: Guardian of the Constitution

Introduction to the Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court of India, established on January 28, 1950, is the apex judicial authority in the Indian legal system. Located in New Delhi, it serves as the final court of appeal and is vested with the power of judicial review. The formation of the Supreme Court marked a significant milestone in India’s legal history, coinciding with the adoption of the Indian Constitution, which came into effect on January 26, 1950.

The creation of the Supreme Court of India was necessitated by the need for a central judicial authority to interpret the Constitution and uphold the rule of law. Before its establishment, the highest judicial body was the Federal Court of India, which functioned from 1937 to 1950. The Supreme Court replaced the Federal Court, inheriting its jurisdiction and expanding its authority to ensure a unified judicial system across the country.

The Supreme Court’s role is multifaceted, encompassing the interpretation of constitutional provisions, adjudication of significant legal disputes, and protection of fundamental rights. Its decisions are binding on all lower courts within the Indian territory, thereby ensuring uniformity in the application of laws. Additionally, the Supreme Court acts as a guardian of the Constitution, safeguarding democratic values and principles enshrined in the document.

The structure of the Supreme Court of India comprises the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and a sanctioned strength of 34 judges, including the CJI. The appointment process for judges is meticulously outlined to maintain the independence and integrity of the judiciary. The President of India appoints the judges, based on the recommendations of the Collegium system, which includes the CJI and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court.

In its capacity as the highest court, the Supreme Court of India has played a pivotal role in shaping the legal and social landscape of the nation. Its landmark judgments have addressed critical issues ranging from individual rights to complex constitutional questions, reinforcing its status as the ultimate custodian of justice in India.

Jurisdiction and Powers of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India stands as the apex judicial authority, wielding extensive powers and jurisdiction as outlined in the Constitution. The court’s jurisdiction is categorized into three primary types: original, appellate, and advisory.

Firstly, the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court enables it to hear disputes between different states of the union or between the central government and one or more states. This unique jurisdiction empowers the court to act as the primary forum for adjudicating inter-state conflicts, thus ensuring a harmonious federal structure.

Secondly, the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court allows it to hear appeals from lower courts, including high courts. This jurisdiction covers a wide array of cases, from civil and criminal appeals to constitutional matters. The court’s role in this regard is crucial as it serves as the ultimate arbiter, providing finality to legal disputes and ensuring uniformity in the application of law across the nation.

Moreover, the Supreme Court of India possesses advisory jurisdiction, wherein the President of India may seek its opinion on questions of law or fact that are of public importance. While the court’s advisory opinions are not binding, they hold significant persuasive value and guide governmental actions and policies.

A critical aspect of the Supreme Court’s powers is its authority of judicial review. This power enables the court to evaluate the constitutionality of legislative acts and executive orders. Through judicial review, the Supreme Court ensures that all laws and governmental actions conform to the Constitution, thereby safeguarding the fundamental rights of citizens and maintaining the supremacy of the constitutional framework.

In its interpretative capacity, the Supreme Court of India plays a pivotal role in developing constitutional jurisprudence. By interpreting ambiguous provisions and resolving constitutional questions, the court adapts the living document of the Constitution to contemporary needs, ensuring its relevance and efficacy in changing societal contexts.

Notable Judgments and Landmark Cases

The Supreme Court of India has been instrumental in shaping the legal and social landscape of the country through its landmark judgments. One of the most significant cases is Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973). This case established the ‘Basic Structure Doctrine,’ which limits the Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution. The court ruled that while the Parliament has wide-ranging powers, it cannot alter the basic structure or essential features of the Constitution, thereby safeguarding its integrity.

Another pivotal case is the decriminalization of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. In the case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court decriminalized consensual homosexual acts between adults, which was previously criminalized under Section 377. This judgment was a giant leap towards equality and human rights, recognizing the rights of the LGBTQ+ community and affirming that sexual orientation is an intrinsic part of an individual’s identity.

The Right to Privacy judgment in the case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) is another landmark decision by the Supreme Court of India. The court declared that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under the Constitution. This judgment has far-reaching implications, influencing various aspects of law, including data protection, surveillance, and individual freedoms. It underscores the importance of personal liberty and the protection of personal information in the digital age.

These cases, among many others, highlight the Supreme Court of India’s role as the guardian of the Constitution. Through its judgments, the court has not only interpreted the law but has also reinforced the values of democracy, justice, and human rights. Each landmark decision has contributed to the evolving jurisprudence, reflecting the dynamic nature of Indian society and its legal system.

Challenges and Criticisms

The Supreme Court of India, while being the apex judicial body in the country, is not immune to challenges and criticisms. One of the foremost issues that have been highlighted is judicial overreach. This occurs when the judiciary is perceived to interfere excessively in the functions of the legislative and executive branches of the government. Critics argue that such actions undermine the principle of separation of powers, which is a cornerstone of the Constitution of India.

Another significant challenge faced by the Supreme Court of India is the pendency of cases. The backlog of cases has been a persistent problem, leading to delayed justice for many. As of recent reports, there are millions of cases pending across various courts in India, with a substantial number awaiting resolution at the Supreme Court level. This delay erodes public trust in the judicial system and hampers the right to a fair and timely trial.

Judicial reforms are often suggested as a remedy to these challenges. Proposals include increasing the number of judges, enhancing the use of technology in court proceedings, and streamlining judicial processes to reduce delays. However, the implementation of these reforms has been slow and faces numerous hurdles.

Transparency and accountability within the judiciary are also areas of concern. The process of judicial appointments, particularly to the Supreme Court, has been a topic of intense debate. The Collegium system, wherein a group of senior judges appoints other judges, has been criticized for its lack of transparency and susceptibility to nepotism. Calls for a more transparent and accountable system, such as the establishment of a Judicial Appointments Commission, have been recurrent but remain contentious.

In sum, while the Supreme Court of India plays a vital role as the guardian of the Constitution, it must continually address these challenges and criticisms to uphold its credibility and efficacy in the eyes of the public. The pursuit of judicial reforms, ensuring transparency, and maintaining a balance of power are essential steps towards strengthening the judiciary and fostering public trust.

Share, comment and follow. Feel free to share your thoughts 💭